You can see and download the slides at Slideshare (German). As I promised to write a detailed post about ARIA enhanced tab navigation for the Webkrauts web standards advent calendar (think of a German version of 24 ways) you will be able to enjoy an English tutorial soon. Never mind the references to Chris in the slides — I had to choose an example from my flickr pictures, and I believe there are too many presentations already with kittens.

The conference was surprisingly innovative: I half expected a crowd of suits as the event was co-organized by the Austrian Ministry of Health, Family and Youth, instead there were many young faces and a fair percentage of women. Things I have learned (and tweeted about) include:

• As of January 2009, websites sponsored by the Austrian Ministry of Health will only receive funding when they are accessible. That doesn’t come as a surprise as a European Ministerial Declaration in 2006 announced that accessibility and best practices could become mandatory in public procurement in 2010.
• Artur Ortega showed examples of Dirk Ginader’s accessibility features for Yahoo! Finance, including two input fields where the labels were dynamically updated after a currency was chosen. So a screenreader read “convert pound sterling to euros” instead of “convert currency to currency.”
• One reason for JavaScript enhanced HTML controls for Flash objects like Yahoo! video is that the Flash object cannot get tab focus when the wmode param is set to opaque or transparent. Still without that param it is impossible to tab into a Flash object in Firefox 3. Or did I overlook something?
• Designer Maria Putzhuber quoted an interesting delusion: 70% of designers believe that visitors are almost always able to maintain orientation while in fact just 10% of the visitors are able to achieve this. What do you think is the reason?

Deutsche Fassung

1. Older people have difficulties with drop-down and multi-level menus, because their manual dexterity, eye-hand coordination and space perception decreases. Also some move the mouse when clicking, or tremble, hence it’s more likely they slip off the menu. Hell, that happens to me frequently!

   However, did you notice the Windows Start Menu is more forgiving when you slip off an item? There’s a little delay before the secondary level is hidden. Perhaps we need an event-capturing script tolerating a slip from the menu rather than the immediate reaction of the mouseout event.

2. Nested menus are more complex. According to Hick’s Law orientation in a multi-level menu can take longer than multiple clicks in a flat menu with good information architecture. See an earlier article for the math.

3. The navigation must be accessible by keyboard alone. The result should be the same, whether you hover over an item or tab to it. So check for the focus event and CSS pseudo-class. Don’t forget to test backwards tabbing (shift tab). By the way, mobile devices have no mouse either…

   The tab order should be consistent and logical, i.e. not jumping around on a page. Also the focused item should be visible, for example highlighted with the default 1px dotted border some browsers draw around it. Some people think this is ugly and remove the default border. That is a no-no.

   And if you really want desktop behavior, add support for the arrow keys (event.keyCode 37-40). Keep in mind though that screen readers have predefined functions for the arrow keys in combination with the ctrl, shift, or alt keys. In JavaScript those keys can be detected with the event.ctrlKey, event.altKey, and event.shiftKey properties. Also crossbrowser event delegation for focus or blur events can be a bitch, thankfully PPK has a solution.

4. Users of AT should have means to skip content. That’s possible with semantic markup: a menu as (nested) list(s) enables them to jump to the next block. Also there should be a few skip links at the beginning of the code pointing to important sections on the page, such as content, navigation, or search. Mobile users also profit from that technique (try surfing eBay with Opera Mini ).

5. Pages never link to themselves. When I click on a link (the menu being no exception) I expect to land on a different page. Therefore it’s confusing to land on the same page. This happened to me recently when I was filling out a form on my mobile phone and got the same page with an error message. It took me a while to realize where I was. It’s the same whether you have a tiny screen or a low screen resolution to see things larger when you are visually impaired: you only see a small part of the page, so it’s hard to realize when something unexpected happens.

6. You can add some semantic sugar with the ARIA role property. In this case <ul role="navigation"> would be appropriate. I strongly encourage you to use ARIA as it is widely supported by browsers and screen readers, enhances a disabled user’s experience, and doesn’t break old browsers. A most recent introduction has been written by Gez Lemon for the Opera Developer Community.

7. If a second level navigation is initially hidden with display:none it won’t be in the screen reader buffer. Therefore off-screen positioning is a better idea, else you need to update the buffer by writing random values into a hidden input field.

8. A common problem in menus is limited horizontal space. Text should be scalable, and it must not jut-out into other page elements when it is enlarged. Even normal text can break a narrow menu when you think of internationalization. In German there are many composite words. While building a website for a competing brand I came across a menu item on the Philips website for “male grooming.” The German word „Körperhaarpflegesystem” is guaranteed to blow every menu!

   Another common problem that prevents scaling in menus are text graphics. I know marketing just loves to see the corporate font in the main menu, but text in images can’t be scaled, people with visual impairments can’t change text and background colors for higher contrast, and Flash Image Replacement like sIFR still has accessibility issues, is known to distort fonts, is CPU intensive and slow. The bottom line is: don’t use text as images, make textual information text.

So much for accessibility. Besides there are a few technical issues to consider: mobile devices often have problems with JavaScript or with layers. Some proxies in large companies filter JavaScript for security reasons, so you can’t rely on the ubiquitous availability, your script has to be unobtrusive, and you can’t rely on noscript either. Don’t even think of creating a menu from JavaScript arrays.

Moreover there’s a well-known bug in IE6 responsible for showing select lists always in front of any layers (like your second level menu), regardless of a z-index. Thankfully there are plugins like bgiframe for jQuery to solve this. Multi-level menus can bloat the code, event handling can be CPU intensive (use event delegation). And if large amounts of menu code is at the beginning, the real content gets further behind and less relevant for search engines.

In conclusion, for an alleged quicker entry you pay with many disadvantages. Often drop-down menus just conceal a poorly planned information architecture. I would reconsider their usage.

Did I forget something? What’s your opinion on drop-down menus? Love them or hate them?

So when Chris mentions JavaScript badges for del.icio.us, I think of Ed Eliot’s PhpDelicious or how to get similar results in WordPress. Naturally when he had the splendid idea to add captioning to YouTube videos with Google’s JavaScript API, I asked myself if there wasn’t a better way. There is, but to my surprise neither YouTube nor Yahoo! Video take advantage of that capability:

1. It’s common practice to implement text content in Flash via XML.
2. DFXP is a W3C XML standard for captioning videos.
3. There are free tools like MAGpie for creating captions, and they all support DFXP.
4. If YouTube or Yahoo! Video would allow users to upload and attach a DFXP file to a video, it would become dead easy for anybody to caption it. Not only for the filmmaker, captioning could be crowdsourced!

Just anticipating Joe Clark’s inevitable (and justifiable) objection: of course captioning is not an easy thing that anybody can do, to do it right it requires people with special training. But considering the number of videos on those platforms the only affordable and practical solution to provide any captioning at all is crowdsourcing. That can also be applied to the control of quality, accuracy, or reporting abuse.

Of course this would enhance primarily accessibility, but the XML files would further help search engines to index video content. And their marketing people would love such a feature for the positive PR!

Well, I submitted the suggestion both to Google and Yahoo!, you can vote on the Yahoo! Developer Network for it (Google is more closed-lipped). I’m curious who will be the first to offer that feature …

Most rollovers have become obsolete because they can be performed on background images with CSS sprites. If there are hover effects today, they usually come as text on a button background image, or as a text link with an icon next to it.

However, there are those rare cases when there is just an icon without text, like a “play” or “pause” button, or a magnification glass on an image to signal it can be enlarged. If you want to swap images when the element receives focus or on mouseover, traditionally you are stuck with two options:

1. JavaScript to change the image source, or
2. CSS sprites to change the position of a background image behind a transparent gif image.

I like neither. Using JavaScript and two images with pre-loading seems like a waste of resources when it can be done with CSS and one image only. Transparent gifs are so 1998, besides the background usually doesn’t get printed. So what we need on these occasions are CSS sprites for foreground images.

Until recently I thought that can’t be done, but then I stumbled upon some code for checkbox widgets in Dojo. Naturally they use a lot of JavaScript for the task. Anyway I like my default checkboxes and don’t have any urge to make them prettier (I have no doubt our design overlords would enforce aqua icons everywhere), but that made me think. Here’s a suggestion:

First a simple sprite which is 50px wide:

The HTML code uses the dimensions of a single icon for width and height to allow fast page rendering without reflow:

1. <a href="/big/" class="icon">
2. <img src="/img/icon-enlarge.gif" id="magnifier" width="19" height="15" alt="enlarge image" />
3. </a>

The corresponding CSS sets the link to display: block, uses the single icon dimensions for the container, prevents overflow, and resets the image dimensions to auto to prevent distortion. The actual image swapping is achieved by a negative left margin on hover.

1. a.icon {
2. display: block;
3. width: 19px;
4. height: 15px;
5. overflow: hidden;
6. }
7. a.icon img {
8. width: auto;
9. height: auto;
10. border: none;
11. }
12. a.icon:hover img, a.icon:focus img, a.icon img.hover {
13. margin-left: −31px;
14. }

For the sake of simplicity I ignored how the link would be floated or positioned. Also borders, a background color, or padding to increase the clickable area can be added to the parent element.

For simplicity I chose a link in the example, but the same can be done with a div surrounding an <input type="image" />. Then of course you need to define cursor: pointer, and for anything below IE7 bind the DOM event to the hovering element (get the source):

1. <!--[if lt IE 7]>
2. <script type="text/javascript">
3. oIcon = {
4. setHoverClass : function() {
5. this.className = 'hover';
6. },
7. resetHoverClass : function() {
8. this.className = '';
9. }
10. };
11. var elm = document.getElementById('magnifier');
12. if (elm) {
13. elm.onmouseover = elm.onfocus = oIcon.setHoverClass;
14. elm.onmouseout = elm.onblur = oIcon.resetHoverClass;
15. }
16. </script>
17. <![endif]-->

Here is a working example. You know how to adjust the code if you need more than one class on the image.

That was nice and easy. It’s tested in Firefox 2, Opera 9, Internet Explorer 5+, and Safari 2. Screen readers should be okay with the alt text.

Discussion

The trouble begins when people start turning off browser features.

People with disabled images won’t be able to read the alternative text because the visible area is limited by the parent container. That can be detected by comparing the known sprite size with the alt text size. Then the class is set to anything but icon so that the parent container expands.

More severe is when people disable style sheets because then they will see a squeezed image with multiple icons. If you are hyper-correct, you could replace the crushed multi-icon image with the correct single icon (you could use the class or rel attribute to define the icon type), but nobody wants to slice images. As a compromise I would suggest to replace the icon with its alt text.

See the script to detect disabled images or CSS. (Note: it isn’t implemented here because I couldn’t test it properly on IE6 with stuff turned off.)

If JavaScript is unavailable, the user is stranded with what we gave him. Also icons without text are inherently evil because they can’t be enlarged by zoom readers. Did I forget any politically correct disclaimer for obscure use scenarios?

So we ended up with a CSS only version, but still some JavaScript is needed for the extra effort to provide the same experience to users of IE 5-6, and some more for certain user scenarios. Wouldn’t it be easier to slice and swap foreground images the old way? But then again slicing is a pain, and people already start using background images. Do people actually turn off CSS and images? Or is that another remnant of WCAG 1.0 from 1999?

The traditional focus of performance optimization has been on the backend, i.e. system efficiency. But comparing a number of high profile websites, the Yahoo! team found that frontend performance is responsible for 80-98% of the perceived response time. Therefore doubling the frontend performance gains more than doubling the backend performance. In case studies Yahoo! Search became 40-50% faster, the Yahoo! Mail web application gained 70-100%. Of course there are ways to increase backend performance without throwing in more hardware, but better frontend performance reduces traffic and saves resources.

Saving resources on the client side, particularly CPU usage, also pays off in speed. Event delegation is faster than a large number of event handlers. Likewise we know that reducing the number of HTTP requests through techniques like CSS sprites, sliding doors, or file aggregation increases speed. The reason is the limit of two parallel requests per host imposed by HTTP 1.1. That results in a download queue of two requests at a time, increasing the perceived response time of a page. By configuring additional host aliases for your server you can increase the number of parallel requests — but more than 2-4 also increase DNS lookups resulting in higher CPU usage and slower response times.

I wonder when Yahoo! will present us another impressive calculation how many gigawatts have been preserved by reducing CPU usage in client PCs and in their data centers, as one participant asked in the Q&A part. Energy efficient servers are the next big thing, but are there any concrete suggestions for greener programming? Is AJAX destroying the ozone layer?

Environmental issues aside, here’s the list of rules. I’ll keep it short where I have written about it in my previous article. See the examples and testcases by Steve Souders.

1. Make fewer HTTP requests: This also affects cookies. Eliminate unnecessary cookies, keep them small, set them at granular domain levels (e.g. finance.yahoo.com instead of .yahoo.com), and set an appropriate Expires date.
2. Use a content distribution network (CDN) like Akamai where your (static) content is served from distributed data centers located nearer to your client. Even if your website is not as big as Google you can profit from faster response times by using the YUI library’s own CDN.
3. Add an Expires header not just for images, but also for JavaScript and stylesheet files.
4. Enable gzip: 90%+ of browsers support compression, and gzip is better supported and compresses more than deflate. Gzip HTML files, CSS, scripts, XML, JSON — no images or PDFs.
5. Put CSS at the top, avoid @import as it loads last, even after the images!
6. Move scripts to the bottom as they block parallel downloads even across hostnames and block rendering of any code below them.
7. Avoid CSS expressions as they execute many times and cost CPU.

8. Use external JavaScript and CSS files. Inline CSS is apparently faster for a user’s start page, but not on subsequent pages. After the page has finished loading, use the time to preload scripts to speed up secondary pages.

   1. window.onload = downloadComponents;
   2. function downloadComponents() {
   3. var elem = document.createElement("script");
   4. elem.src = "http://.../file1.js";
   5. document.body.appendChild(elem);
   6. }
9. Reduce DNS lookups for the reasons stated above. Use 1-4 hosts and the keep alive setting.
10. Minify JavaScript with JSMin — inline scripts, too.
11. Avoid redirects as they are the worst form of blocking. Set Expires headers for redirects to enable caching.
12. Remove duplicate files: this is self-explanatory, but it can happen in large teams with many scripts and stylesheets.

13. Mind the ETag: Now this was something I never paid attention to. ETags are unique identifiers to distinguish files that share a URI. They are transmitted in the HTTP header. The default server setting uses the INode, the bytesize and the modification date of a file to calculate a unique ID. Unless servers in a cluster are identical, ETags differ, therefore the files are not cached. Fortunately ETags can be configured in Apache, so it should be possible to match them across different servers.

    1. FileETag MTime Size

    Note that the ETag is also relevant for RSS feeds. For example, currently the W3C talks feed is more or less unusable: some feed readers and services apparently regard the ETag, the feed is mirrored on many servers, so the same news entry from a different server is shown as new and unread multiple times every day…

14. Make AJAX cacheable and small. Some data like a user’s address book or buddy list change infrequently and should be requested via GET, cached, and set with a Last-modified timestamp and gzipped.

These are a lot of rules, and they will be published in a O’Reilly book by Steve Souders and Tenni Theurer in September 2007. Anyway, don’t be overwhelmed by their mass, instead you can start with the easy things: “harvest the low hanging fruit.” Enable caching with the Expire date setting and reduce the number of HTTP requests. You can deal with the rest later.

Finally Nate Koechley announced a Yahoo! performance tool called YSlow as a plugin for the indespensible Firebug extension. He also recommended the commercial IBM Page Detailer, and LiveHTTPHeaders to visualize what’s happening in your browser.

In this post:

• Dan Cederholm: Bulletproof web design
• Robin Christopherson: Beyond a code audit
• Cameron Moll: Mobile web design
• Nate Koechley: Yahoo! vs. Yahoo! vs. Yahoo!
• Tantek Çelik: Microformats: evolving the web
• “Hot topics” panel
• More presentations

The evening:before featured another get-together in a fancy work:after club, which can be summed up like this: Sweden won against Paraguay, and it was hard to talk to others because some notorious DJ wouldn’t turn down the volume. He desperately tried to get somebody on the dance floor switching from house music to r&b pop, but didn’t realize that was not what the audience wanted.

Bulletproof web design

If there was an award for best presentation, Dan Cederholm would get my vote! His slides were so well-designed, so clean, and the special effects (not seen in the PDF version) contributed to clarify the scope.

It was like Jeremy Keith’s presentation the day before, where you knew all the things he was talking about, still something made “click” and shifted your perception — and if it’s only that you think “that’s what I always needed to show to my designers!”

Scene from the early computer game Dig Dug (Atari 1983), where you pump up monsters until they explode

His example for thinking ahead showed a photo of a new warehouse in San Francisco, where the windows had been inserted to be future proof, but cemented over for the current use. So think ahead, because content amount and text size may vary, content changes and needs to be maintained, and because the environment can change. Take something off, like images, CSS, or JavaScript, and make sure the website still functions.

“The journey begins by letting go of control, and becoming flexible.”

John Allsopp, “A Dao of Web Design”

A lot of his examples worked by setting a 50% value for the horizontal or vertical background-position in combination with overlapping images, and he introduced the term “Dig Dug Text Test” as a metaphor for pumping up text and assuring the design is still not destroyed. Reminder to self: add more references to early 1980’s games in presentations, they are so cool!

Beyond a code audit

Robin Christopherson’s bad karma was that he relied on the unreliable wireless network in the conference center, therefore a few examples from the web refused to work.

But by struggling with the technical constraints he set a real-world example for the attending web developers. Robin is blind, and he did not notice the Windows XP bubbles popping up once in a while trying to alert him that the network was unavailable. He was unable to login on the QE2CC screen, because it was inaccessible and refreshed too often. Also most people I spoke with were deeply impressed by the incredible speed his screen reader was set to.

He had also prepared a couple of educational films about challenges on the web for people beyond the visually impaired, like a woman with learning disabilities who didn’t understand the word “disclaimer,” or a quadriplegic with a mouthstick and a voice recognition system, which was useless when the alt text in images or Flash applications did not match the displayed text. I know what a tremendous amount of work the production of such little films is, and I’m looking forward to access them on Robin’s site. Also check his speaker’s notes.

Mobile web design

Cameron Moll mentioned a few times that he had held this presentation a year ago. Therefore it was very professional, very slick, but a little unemotional and in my opinion not quite up to date.

Okay, there are more mobile phones than computers, more mobiles than landline connections, but he didn’t stress the incredible impact the wide adoption of Opera supporting JavaScript on cellphones will have. That’s finally a common platform for web applications using Ajax, as opposed to hundreds of different implementations of Java which are almost impossible to test. That’s a most remarkable development with the potential of revolutionizing mobile applications — Cameron hardly mentioned it, although this became public in November 2005.

Of course WML is dead, long live XHTML MP! You should serve content from a .mobi domain and concentrate on the contextually relevant information: People might check their eBay watchlist on their cellphone, but they don’t upload items to sell, so ignore features like that when developing for mobile devices.

Also my question about Vodafone and other carriers inserting invalid code in the pages they serve through their proxy might not have been clear enough, because Cameron replied it’s up to the carriers and the browsers how to interpret pages, while developers can control the code.

Unfortunately that’s untrue when carriers compress images more and insert JavaScript to get the original images with higher resolutions with a key combination. One script is inserted with the deprecated language attribute in the header, while the other comes after the closing </html> tag, thus rendering your valid XHTML strict code to tag soup. The problem not only manifests on mobile browsing devices, but also when you surf with a regular notebook using your mobile access. Therefore a @media handheld CSS, browser sniffing, or serving the MIME type depending on the HTTP accept header are all doomed. And there’s no way to prevent the carriers from doing such evil.

Yahoo! vs. Yahoo! vs. Yahoo!

I went to this presentation because Nate Koechley recently published his smart concept paper about graded browser support, which we immediately adopted. What I didn’t expect was a most impressive roller coaster trip through browser performance!

Yahoo! has a beta version out for their new portal, also Yahoo! Photos and Yahoo! Mail is under development. All of them make more or less heavy use of DHTML and Ajax. Yahoo’s goals were increasing performance by 300%, adding interactivity (vulgo: drag & drop), and supporting web standards.

For a fast response they used techniques like CSS sprites, or memory management. In Nate’s words browsers are still “a pain in the ass,” and “the web is the most hostile software engineering environment imaginable.” DHTML leaks memory like a sieve, so for each constructor use a destructor. Instead of adding events to thousands of email objects Yahoo! used the existing document.onmousemove event and checked if the mouse was over an object or white space, then passed the event to that object or drew a rectangular choice box. Key concepts are conservation, destruction, and recycling iFrames (about:blank). Use Drip as a tool for measuring memory leaks, test extreme object counts, test long interactions, and test extensive navigation.

Also their developers prefer JSON over XML because parsing XML degrades performance greater than linear as XML size increases.

They have identified HTTP requests as a main performance killer. Browsers still only process two or four HTTP requests at a time, especially start pages are not cached as effectively as they imagined, and parsing JavaScript freezes the browser. Therefore they rather serve a single large file with CSS in the header, and JavaScript as close to the </body> tag as possible.

Regarding browsers it is faster to develop for standards, than patch. Browser support must not be binary, and it does not mean “the same.”

Expecting two users using different browser software to have an identical experience fails to embrace or acknowledge the heterogenous essence of the Web.

There are more IE5 browsers out there than IE 5.5, and IE7 “already moved the needle.”

With all the DHTML and Ajax I was concerned about accessibility, but in a sidenote I almost missed Nate mentioned the IBM contribution for DHTML accessibility. Wonderful!

Microformats: evolving the web

When microformats are even on the radar of Bill Gates, how could I ignore them? I had no clue before Tantek Çelik’s presentation @media 2006, and now I’m implementing them in this post. Microformats are virulent.

Basically you insert a few class names into your code, like

1. <p class="vcard">
2. <a class="url fn"
href="http://tantek.com"> Tantek Çelik</a>
3. </p>

There are microformats for contact cards, calendars, reviews, geo information, and many more. Even the Creative Commons license and the PICS label implemented in this page count as microformats. XFN and XOXO, too.

You can parse this page through a Technorati contacts feed service or use a tool like the Tails extension for Firefox, and voilà, there’s a vcard you could import into your address book (if there wasn’t this Thunderbird bug which prevents exactly this). With the hcalendar microformat you synchronize your calendar with event schedules on a website accordingly.

There are a few issues I ran into when I implemented hcards, and the documentation could have more examples, but they are on Tantek’s to-do list. Also sometimes it means extra, non-semantic markup, but as microformats increase semantic meaning, I assume it gets Tim Berners-Lee’s blessing. So go for it, microformats are definitely among the web’s next big things!

“Hot topics” panel

I had the pleasure to meet Molly Holzschlag earlier in a coffee break, and while I was sorry I couldn’t attend her session I18N, awakening the sleeping giant, I’m confident I didn’t miss much information as I am pretty familiar with her old articles in her regular column in WebTechniques and the current activity of the W3C I18N group, where she is a member.

Jens Grochtdreis reports in his blog about the passionate presentation she gave earlier, and although there is more technical experience and awareness in Europe with multilingual websites, rarely they pay respect to cultural differences, like the meaning of colors. Molly gives everything to educate on I18N and promote web standards, she is also a member of WaSP. I’m glad she seems to have found a way to get some help and support, as she is an outstanding, but sensitive person.

Anyway, she was part of the “hot topics” panel, where questions from the audience where considered by a group of experts: Molly, Jon Hicks, Jeremy Keith, Eric Meyer, and Tantek Çelik. They had a lot of fun and agreed CSS has become more mainstream in the last year, as you don’t have to defend CSS against table layout anymore. Well, reading the discussions in German forums and reviewing the code of other websites, there’s still a lot of educational work to be done. Also they talked about the accessibility of Ajax, and mashups as the next big thing, but you can read a decent transcript of the session in Stuart’s blog over at Muffinresearch.

Conclusions

If you have followed me this far, you can see @media was a big inspiration, it was a lot of fun, especially the after event on Saturday, and I can only recommend the conference! There are endless flickr pictures and quite a few blog entries on Technorati if you need further impressions. Um, and never mind the British food …

More presentations

Here are the presentations in the parallel track I couldn’t attend. Also there will be pod- and videocasts available soon.

• Dave Shea: Fine typography on the web
• Andy Budd: Bug hunting
• DOM Scripting: The Next Level
• Andy Clarke: The fine art of web design

In this post:

• Eric Meyer: Keynote
• Jeremy Keith: Using DOM scripting to plug the holes in CSS
• Chris Wilson: IE: 7 and beyond
• The new accessibility guidelines: WCAG 2.0
• Jeffrey Veen: Designing the next generation of web apps

Introducing geeks to a social life

There was some socializing the evening before the conference where I met with a couple of Germans, like Jens Grochtdreis who initiated the German web standardista group “Webkrauts”, Jan Eric Hellbusch whose website I had noticed before for some master theses about accessibility, or Tomas Caspers who is a member of WaSP and the mastermind behind the accessibility portal Einfach für alle. Actually I wasn’t the only one to notice he looks like the lost fifth member of the German punk band “Die Toten Hosen”?… Also that’s where I met Roger Johansson, whose technical blog 456 Berea Street is a must-read for CSS and accessibility aware coders.

So my first day on @media began with a walk through polluted London air along surveillance cameras and anti-tank barriers along the Houses of Parliament over to the queue in front of the Queen Elizabeth II Conference Center (QE2CC) where we got nice bags and name tags. I would suggest shawls with the @media logo for next year to stand a chance against the bloody cold air conditioning while it was 28° C outside.

Eric Meyer: Keynote

The conference started with a keynote by Eric Meyer with his personal impressions of the last ten years of the web. Quite interesting since I’ve been reading his articles on Web Review, where he published among other things the famous CSS browser compatibility chart, a great companion in my struggle with 4th generation browsers.

Looking back, he realized the following truths:

1. Small groups of dedicated experts can change a lot (e.g. the CSS Samurai, or Tantek Çelik who introduced doctype switching).
2. Free information is an essential part of any new web technology’s adoption.
3. You don’t hear much anymore from people or companies who kept information as a “personal advantage.”
4. You might be the first who thought about a certain solution. Savour this moment, and then share it.

Using DOM scripting to plug the holes in CSS

As an example, Jeremy Keith introduced the techniques of Buck Owens, the first musician to “hack” the tinny sound of early radios by replacing the bass with a regular guitar. So his tracks sounded better and got more airtime. Using DOM scripting to work around incomplete CSS implementations or to simulate CSS 3 behavior is basically the same, as long as there aren’t yet browsers with “great bass.”

Okay, most of the stuff in his presentation sounded familiar, and I’d rather set zebra stripes on table row backgrounds server side. Still I got some inspiration how to do some things better. For example it never occurred to me to combine selectors like

1. document.getElementById("id") .getElementsByTagName("p")

Or I never thought of using a universal selector in JavaScript:

document.getElementsByTagName("*")

Also the next time I’m manipulating an object’s class, I promise to do it by writing some reusable functions like

1. document.getElementByClassName()
2. function addClass(element, className)

And after I createElement I should set more attributes by setting a className instead of adding each attribute separately.

When he mentioned CSS 3, I learned that Safari is already capable of handling multiple background images. And I liked his introduction of the geeky Star Trek term of a “Kobayashi Maru scenario” for a no-win situation, or his translation of object detection

1. if (document.getElementById) { }

with “you must be this high to ride.” Rather cool, and a very entertaining presentation.

IE: 7 and beyond

Chris Wilson worked on the Mosaic browser (that’s, like, Netscape 1 — scary, isn’t it?) and on IE ever since version 2. Praise him for first implementing CSS in IE3, blame him for some nasty bugs he’s personally responsible for in IE6. Also he’s the one who wrote he will quit (and probably become a professional surfer) the day he loses his passion or IE gets mothballed again.

After some blatant promotion for all the outstanding new features and fixes in IE7, things you can read about in the IEBlog if you haven’t yet, he came to the interesting facts:

First of all, they are planning the next two releases now, and it won’t take another five years until IE8 will emerge. Also IE7+ for Windows Vista is only marketing speak, what counts is that it has the same features as IE7 for Windows XP, except for some vista-only security and parental control. IE7 will ship in “second half 2006.” More precisely, the Malaysian Vista developer Jabez Gan disclosed earlier that December 6 will be the release date.

Because of the deep interaction with the operating system they can’t push it as a critical Windows update, but they will “strongly encourage people to update.” The new fonts won’t be deployed with the update, more likely in a separate package, simply because with Unicode support some are too large.

On a technical side they are aware of developer’s problems to test on multiple versions of IE. Though it is technically hard to have a friendly co-existence of multiple IEs because they provide the operating system, it should be possible to create side-by-side versions of the browser only. Yay, that’s what we want!

Also they would like to support the XHTML MIME type, but want to do it right, later. Same is true for advanced DOM support, or passing the Acid2 test. What’s next for the web? Mashups, RSS, microformats, and XMLHttpRequest (did you know there’s a W3C working draft?). XForms is on their radar, but they need to coordinate efforts with other browser vendors.

Besides Chris recommended some tools like an expression finder to spot CSS hacks, or an application compatibility toolkit, stuff you can download as part of the Internet Explorer 7 Readiness Toolkit from Microsoft with a genuine copy or from someplace else without.

The new accessibility guidelines: WCAG 2.0

I had hoped that by visiting the panel about WCAG ['wu:kæg] I could avoid having to read the unreadable myself, but I was disappointed. You will read in another post about it. Not much else to tell about that panel, except WCAG 2.0 is probably not as bad as we have thought. There are notes and the slides available on accessify.com.

Designing the next generation of web apps

Jeffrey Veen is the partner of Jesse James Garrett who gets all the attention for coining the term “Ajax.” Anyway, Ajax is so going to change our world. Like the automobile, or the Great Depression. Some will get more mobile, some will get greatly depressed when the web becomes inaccessible.

In another panel the speakers agreed that Ajax can make live easier as an enhancement (Jeremy Keith calls it “Hijax”), but shouldn’t be a world of pain for the others. Actually I can see some of Jeff’s examples (use Stuart Colville’s notes to understand the slides) as an enhancement. Like giving immediate feedback when input fields in a form validate, while degrading gracefully by giving feedback after a regular submit.

You can enhance understanding by coloring and visualizing rainfall values in a nicely designed table, or you can further enhance it by making it interactive with a fader to choose cities on a map. But I can’t imagine how to have both.

In another example he showed a mashup of Google Maps with a Chicago crime database. Nice, but how can that be made accessible? So that people without JavaScript, or screen reader and braille display users with JavaScript can access the raw data table that lies under the visualization?

There was a lot of talk how today’s websites will be tomorrow’s web applications, but like Nate Koechley put it: You can’t just copy one aspect of desktop applications while ignoring the accessible alternatives. Desktop applications are accessible with multiple input devices, like a mouse or a keyboard. Screen readers can get the content. Don’t you forget it when developing the “next generation off apps.” There’s more than just good looks.